DraftCounsel · Engine status
What is switched on right now
The running configuration, read at the moment you loaded this page — the same booleans the code branches on. Dormant layers say so and say why; nothing below is marketing copy.
21
Deterministic doc types
14
Enforced gates
34/259
Authority sources verified
Rendered 2026-09-19T21:52:41.554Z — reload for the current state.
Generative gateway
Enforcing — over-budget calls refuseThe gateway refuses calls once the monthly ceiling is reached, with a typed reason and a ledger record. Refusal is the designed behavior: the gateway will not spend its way past a control.
Governed ledger — this month
0
model calls
0
completed
0
errored
0
refused by governance
Presence booleans and counts only — this page can see whether a control exists and how often it ran, never a secret value or a dollar figure. The deterministic clause library and the review/adjudication surfaces run regardless of gateway state.
Deterministic engines
21 clause-library document types (the model authors none of their operative text), including 12 Florida probate filings sealed to the packet builder.
3 state clause packs (FL, AL, AK) · 67 Florida counties with circuit routing on file.
14 gates enforced in code today, 0 built and awaiting their funnel, 0 planned — the coverage matrix lists each with where it is enforced.
The UPL gate runs a deterministic post-generation lint on consumer output — advice-shaped language (“you should sue”, outcome predictions, enforceability assertions) is caught and recorded, not just prompted against. Findings are lens-tagged into the Opposing Counsel Pass; proposed changes export as a native Word tracked-changes redline.
Probate path router, creditor-claim clock, fee presumptions, and packet assembly run entirely from statute-cited pure functions — same engine on screen, in print, and in the .docx export.
Citation verification layers
Nothing is ever labeled “good law” without a licensed citator result, and unverified existence says so on the report — the ladder’s seven levels are documented on the coverage matrix.
Authority monitor
Runtime ledger: recording34 of 259 cited Florida statutes carry a content-hashed snapshot verified against the Legislature’s official text (baseline last verified 2026-08-24) — baselines only move through reviewed source-control history.
Scheduled live re-check last ran 2026-09-19: 34 verified · 0 changed (under review) · 0 unreachable.
Exemplar locality ladder
Grounded runs prefer exemplar filings from as close to the matter’s courthouse as the public record allows — in this order, weighted 25 of 100 scoring points at the top of the ladder. Every foundation’s tier is disclosed on its label and in the run’s Foundation Analysis. Two ladders: litigation instruments from the federal court record climb every rung; state-law instruments — deeds, letters, agreements, the estate instruments, discovery requests, declarations, and every official form, professional sample, or specimen found by live search — climb county, state, and national only, so a form from a neighboring state is national even when the two states share a federal circuit.
- county — Same county — the filing practice of the user’s own courthouse (blessed packs and keyed state-court sources)
- district — Same federal district — the court the matter would actually be heard in
- circuit — Same circuit — controlling appellate conventions (the federal court record; a state-law form or sample from a neighboring state in the same circuit is national)
- state — Same state — a sibling district’s practice, and the state’s own forms, samples, specimens, masters, and packs
- national — National — the general federal record, used only when nothing closer qualifies
Exemplar reliability gates
- Counsel of record required — a pro se filing can never serve as a foundation. The gate is hard: filings with no attorney of record are excluded before ranking, and the exclusion count is disclosed.
- Docket outcome — the court’s own ruling, read from the same public record: a filing the court GRANTED earns 10 of 100 scoring points (5 granted in part); a DENIED filing earns none and is barred from the primary structural slots — usable only as a last-resort companion, labeled as such. Every foundation’s outcome is disclosed on its label and in the Foundation Analysis.
- Professional representation — firm-backed, multi-attorney filings and firms with a demonstrated record of granted filings in the retrieved set score higher. Selection uses objective signals from the court record — never firm-name rankings or endorsements.
Public-record harvest
5 sources registered — automated collection awaits access-terms reviewAn offline pipeline (never in your request path) collects exemplar filings from an allowlisted registry of public court sources, code fetching and the engine verifying — is it the claimed document type, professionally drafted, complete? Verified and borderline candidates land in a counsel review queue for the registry and the packs; since 2026-09-07 a run whose lanes are thin for the user’s state also searches for itself under the same gates (the run-time discovery fallback below) and queues what it found for the same review. Sources whose terms forbid automated access are never enabled — the licensed connectors cover those courts instead.
- Florida Appellate Case Information System (Supreme Court + DCAs) (FL) — access-terms review pending
- Texas Appellate Courts Case Search (Supreme Court + Courts of Appeals) (TX) — access-terms review pending
- California Appellate Courts Case Information (CA) — access-terms review pending
- Alabama Appellate Courts Public Portal (AL) — access-terms review pending
- Alaska Appellate Courts Case Management (AK) — access-terms review pending
Candidate store: 0 harvested · 0 verified · 0 in counsel review · 0 promoted into packs · 0 rejected.
EDGAR EX-10 exemplars (live, no key) — eligible transactional drafts (NDAs, employment, services, LLC and partnership agreements, leases, notes and loans) additionally ground on up to five recent material contracts from the SEC’s public archive — the agreements public companies and their counsel actually execute and file, under the same never-copy, never-name rules — enforced mechanically by the similarity and identity guards. Estate instruments deliberately stay on the deterministic masters.
Official forms and professional samples (live, no key) — demand letters, cease-and-desist letters, quitclaim deeds, bills of sale, guardian designations, prenuptial agreements, discovery requests, and declarations ground on 87 verified sources committed to the registry (60 official forms and public-record specimens from courts, clerks, and agencies; 23 complete samples law firms publish; 4 attorney-authored treatises read for doctrine, never modeled), read live from the publisher with a committed snapshot as the fallback, plus real specimens filed as exhibits in the public court record and executed instruments filed with the SEC — ranked by the same locality ladder (a Brevard deed grounds on Brevard’s own clerk form first) under the same never-copy, never-name guards. Every run also records how the provenance ledger took its rows (provenance_ledger on the run): until the vocabulary migrations are applied, exemplars outside the live vocabulary are pinned on the run itself and carried as ‘licensed’ with the true kind named, or deferred — never misfiled.
Licensed connectors
- UniCourt (licensed API) — keyed-dormant (subscription pending — owner call) · Licensed state and federal trial-court records — county-level exemplars at scale.
- Trellis (licensed API) — keyed-dormant (subscription pending — owner call) · Licensed state trial-court dockets and filings — the same-county answer for state courts.
Open-web exemplar lane
Firms, courts, clerks, agencies, and legal-aid organizations post real filed motions, briefs, official forms, and complete sample agreements across the open web. Discovery runs on a web-search lane with query shapes tuned on live searches (keyed-dormant — search key pending, owner item): nightly for the registry, and, since 2026-09-07, as the Run-time discovery fallback — when a lane has fewer than three exemplars for the matter, or none closer than the national tier, the run itself searches for the state’s official and statutory forms, filed specimens, and firm-published templates (at most three queries and eight reads inside a twenty-second wall clock), and what passes enters the same ranking, pinning, and guards as every other exemplar, marked in the memo as found by live search. Every result passes three mechanical safeguards first: publisher policy (53 publishers allowed — government courts, clerks, and agencies, registered professional publishers, and, by the owner’s 2026-09-07 decision, commercial template publishers, plus law-library or legal-aid publishers only after a recorded terms review · 6 awaiting that review · 5 denied, including every host whose robots.txt forbids automated access, anonymous upload re-publishers, e-filing portals, and case-law databases), robots.txt honored on every fetch, and classification — rules books, administrative orders, court opinions, and blank forms never pass as filed documents; a filed document needs a caption plus a bar number or certificate of service; a sample from a commercial template or an unregistered firm site serves only as a professional sample marked publisher-unverified (structure and completeness, never authority); and everything found is queued for counsel so the registry learns.
Evaluation harness
DraftBench: 240/245 passed240 of 245 checks passed with 5 honest skips (each published with its unlock condition) on the 2026-08-19 run — the complete unedited scorecard is public at /draftbench, and a failing scorecard blocks the release pipeline.
The rest of the trust ladder: what runs deterministically · how the platform is operated · how it tests itself.
DraftCounsel is professional drafting software for licensed attorneys, operated by LegalDraft Technologies LLC. DraftCounsel is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice. All output is AI-generated draft work product offered for attorney review; the supervising attorney is solely responsible for reviewing, revising, approving, and using any work product, and for compliance with applicable rules of professional conduct. Communications with DraftCounsel are not protected by attorney-client privilege.